What Is In a Pre-Sentence Investigation (PSI) For Federal Defendants?
The Pre-Sentence Investigation (PSI) and the subsequent Pre-Sentence Investigation Report (PSR) is without a doubt the most dominant and definitive document used by the Court in determining the length of a defendant’s federal prison sentence. The PSI is the defendant’s “Bible”, his life history as seen through the eyes of the probation officer authoring the report. Besides being instrumental in determining his federal prison sentence, the PSI is vitally important with respect to Bureau of Prisons’ (BOP) federal prison designation, security level, custody level, restitution issues, work assignments, bunk assignments, furlough eligibility, transfers, community custody placement, inmate quality of life enhancements, admission into the 500-Hour Residential Drug Abuse Program and how the inmate is treated in prison by both the guards and inmates. The importance of the PSI cannot be overstated. It follows the defendant throughout his whole period of federal prison incarceration.
The Pre-sentence Investigation Report must apply the advisory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines.
1) In doing this the pre-sentence report must:
(A) Identify all applicable guidelines and policy statements of the Sentencing Commission;
(B) Calculate the defendant’s offense level and criminal history category;
(C) State the resulting sentencing range and kinds of sentences available;
(D) Identify any factor relevant to:
(i) The appropriate kind of sentence, or
(ii) The appropriate sentence within the applicable sentencing range; and
(E) Identify any basis for departing from the applicable sentencing range, either an upward or downward departure.
2) The pre-sentence report must also contain the following additional information:
(A) The defendant’s history and characteristics, including:
(i) Any prior criminal record;
(ii) The defendant’s financial condition; and
(iii) Any circumstances affecting the defendant’s behavior that may be helpful in imposing sentence or in correctional treatment;
(B) Information that assesses any financial, social, psychological, and medical impact on any victim;
(C) When appropriate, the nature and extent of non-prison programs and resources available to the defendant;
(D) When the law provides for restitution, information sufficient for a restitution order;
(E) If the court orders a study under 18 U.S.C. § 3552(b), any resulting report and recommendation; and
(F) Any other information that the court requires, including information relevant to the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a).
(3) The pre-sentence report must not contain any of the following information. All the following must be excluded from the report:
(A) Any diagnoses that, if disclosed, might seriously disrupt a rehabilitation program;
(B) Any sources of information obtained upon a promise of confidentiality; and
(C) Any other information that, if disclosed, might result in physical or other harm to the defendant or others.
The Pre-Sentence Investigation Report is presumed to be fair, accurate, unbiased, and provide a true accounting of the defendant. In most cases it is anything but that. Remember, the PSI is written by a Probation Officer who works for the federal government—the same federal government that is trying to convict the defendant. In most cases the PSI is slanted and biased against the defendant. When this happens, it is up to the defendant’s defense attorney to issue a written objection to the Probation Officer authoring the PSI. In many cases the defense attorney does not do this.
Prisoners often complain that they have been negatively impacted by inaccurate information in their PSI. A number of inmates at a federal prison were recently asked how many were affected negatively by errors in their PSI. Eighty (80%) percent responded that they were negatively affected by errors in their PSI. The eighty (80%) percent that responded were then asked how many were told by their attorney that the errors would have no detrimental effect or consequences. Almost one hundred (100%) percent raised their hands. I cannot emphasize too strongly that the defendant must make sure that any errors in the PSI, his “Bible”, are corrected before he enters prison. I would also recommend that to prevent these errors from getting into his PSI, the defendant’s attorney and/or a knowledgeable Federal Prison Consultant is present at the Pre-Sentencing Investigation Interview. The defendant should not go alone.
This alone speaks highly for having a competent, knowledgeable, and skilled Federal Prison Consultant on board. Currently, the Department of Justice has a 97% guilty plea rate in federal criminal cases. Federal prosecutors have over a 75% conviction rate following trial, and 91% of federal criminal defendants receive a prison sentence. It is no longer a question of will a federal defendant go to prison, it is now a question of how long will he or she be there and where will he/she go. If this doesn’t convince a federal defendant to retain the services of a well-respected Federal Prison Consultant, then he must bear the consequences.